Spectacular evening light on Hardanger Fjord, August 2010. The Sublime is still with us!
Monday, August 9, 2010
Friday, June 11, 2010
Locals and Tourists #60 (GTWA #51): Oslo by Eric Fisher
Tuesday, June 8, 2010
YOOOHOO PANORAMIC INTERCHANGE CLARIFICATION
Yes, everybody should send in a sketch of their work by June 17th and develops the work according to their own plans...
Still, it is necessary to keep in mind that there actually is a point of departure for both the conference and the exhibition. this is not a secret. the dynamics of the project have taken us further ...but the point of departure, which we should take into consideration is...
SHORT VERSION:Artists, that is teachers and students, from the Art Academies of Reykjavik, Vilnius, Stockholm and Bergen will be meeting for workshops in the respective cities, places, landscapes and countries to look at, study and learn, to create a dialogue, to research and develop artistic works related to the idea of the panoramic in the context of a nordic and baltic cultural, social, geographical and historical backdrop.
FOR LONG, elaborate and inclusive VERSION http://panoramicinterchange.blogspot.com/2009/10/project-description-and-schedule-on.html
So, thank you Mathijs for sharing the observations, discussions and thoughts you and the others had while still in Reykjavik. Actually there weren't so many conclusions in these remarks, rather they were valuable observations that could contribute to the further forming of the works, the discussion, the exhibition design and title.
And thank you again, exhibition group, for reminder on date
Another suggestion for a title, which would incorporate and expand on all of the title suggestions so far
Watch out, look out, move back and forth to create space, crossroad, cafe de paris, crossroad.........woo
ooa
ooaah"
Monday, June 7, 2010
towards the exhibition
Concerning our approach towards the exhibition.
During our extra days in Reykjavik we, from Bergen, had a nice talk about this and made an attempt to put some things down.
In the discussion that is going on I feel that we are drifting away from the core, at least not towards it. It feels to me that we are talking about things before clarifying what we have so far.
How do we react on the subject of this program? From what or where do we work? What is the material for our work?
As we know the interests, works and approaches are very different in our group. But by answering these questions we came to one big division inside the whole group.
If we keep the intentional program of the Panoramic Interchange course as our subject we found two/three layers within our group in which we all manoeuvre.
We discussed the two ways to create a panoramic (of any kind) point of view:
Zooming in, - this could mean to grab a detailed subject in the course itself.
We thought of
Baldwin’s research on the KUNO institute
Dillans focus on view furniture
Sindri’s interest in the people participating in the course
some of us focus very much on what they seen/experienced in the course
Zooming out, - here we thought how some of us use material from outside of the course
Café Paris
Lina’s installation
Gabi’s George Bush metaphore
Off course not for everyone it is so clear in what category they fit. Or maybe I don’t even want to call it categories. We just figured that this, especially in relation to creating a panorama, was a clear division to position us in.
What could we do with this?
This could be a way to divide the space, locate the works and create a theme around it. We could also see it as a general thing and work from here.
In the symposium there as well is zooming in/out a present subject (?)
I wonder what your response to this is?
We from Bergen hope to find a solution that does not need such a grand construction around one of the participants’ works (Bryndis, Dillan) and hope to let these works develop by the person itself instead of becoming the visual for the entire show.
During our extra days in Reykjavik we, from Bergen, had a nice talk about this and made an attempt to put some things down.
In the discussion that is going on I feel that we are drifting away from the core, at least not towards it. It feels to me that we are talking about things before clarifying what we have so far.
How do we react on the subject of this program? From what or where do we work? What is the material for our work?
As we know the interests, works and approaches are very different in our group. But by answering these questions we came to one big division inside the whole group.
If we keep the intentional program of the Panoramic Interchange course as our subject we found two/three layers within our group in which we all manoeuvre.
We discussed the two ways to create a panoramic (of any kind) point of view:
Zooming in, - this could mean to grab a detailed subject in the course itself.
We thought of
Baldwin’s research on the KUNO institute
Dillans focus on view furniture
Sindri’s interest in the people participating in the course
some of us focus very much on what they seen/experienced in the course
Zooming out, - here we thought how some of us use material from outside of the course
Café Paris
Lina’s installation
Gabi’s George Bush metaphore
Off course not for everyone it is so clear in what category they fit. Or maybe I don’t even want to call it categories. We just figured that this, especially in relation to creating a panorama, was a clear division to position us in.
What could we do with this?
This could be a way to divide the space, locate the works and create a theme around it. We could also see it as a general thing and work from here.
In the symposium there as well is zooming in/out a present subject (?)
I wonder what your response to this is?
We from Bergen hope to find a solution that does not need such a grand construction around one of the participants’ works (Bryndis, Dillan) and hope to let these works develop by the person itself instead of becoming the visual for the entire show.
Sunday, May 16, 2010
Thursday, May 13, 2010
Tuesday, May 11, 2010
On the other side of the world:
Monday, May 10, 2010
Saturday, May 8, 2010
the artist´s recidency in Laugarvatn, Iceland
http://www.gullkistan.is/
danish artist John Krogh & project Walden:
“The Walden Project, is a concept built upon the ideas of Henry David Thoreau, an american writer and philosopfer, and his book “WALDEN”. For a period of two years he lived in a small cabin near the lake Walden Pond. Here he describes his doings, the way to live for small money, his closeness to nature, and his ideas for a new society. He is the one with the well known line. “Less is more”. My idea is to bring back the walden concept in new form.” JK
Thursday, April 29, 2010
a day without an end
International Panotools Conference 2010
The University of Plymouth will be hosting the Annual Panotools Conference in 2010. The Panotools group, which consists of members based throughout Europe, Canada, America and Japan meet on an annual basis to discuss and showcase their latest work using Panotools-based software.
The conference will take place over a three day period in August and will include visits to ICCI's facilities and the university’s Immersive Vision Theatre and a tour of the local area. Further information about the Panotools Group can be found at: www.panotools-meeting.com
Tuesday, April 27, 2010
Thursday, April 22, 2010
THE LANDSCAPE IN OUR BODIES: EARTH, WATER, AIR, AND FIRE
a post graduate course in Iceland this summer
Where Nature meets Culture
The Svartarkot Centre for Research & Education,Iceland
Monday, April 19, 2010
Reykjavík journal from the New York Times today
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/19/world/europe/19iceland.html?hp
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)























